Loading...
The source of the information is the network, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete
According to a report by Shenzhen News Network on April 18, a unique case of "meat debt and meat repayment" in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province has recently attracted widespread attention. An agricultural products company engaged in pig slaughtering and pork trading was angrily sued by an entrepreneur in his early 20s who owed more than 40 yuan in pork payments. This seems to be an ordinary debt dispute, but because of the judge's skillful mediation, it has become a rather human story.
The plaintiff company thought that the money would be lost, after all, the defendant's shop had closed, the people were unemployed, and the family could not help much. However, the presiding judge saw a turnaround. He knows that although a judgment is easy, it is even more difficult to enforce. If the guy really can't come up with the money, won't the verdict become a dead letter?
As a result, the judge began to patiently communicate with both parties to find the best way to solve the problem. After repeated negotiations, we finally came up with a best of both worlds that would allow the plaintiff company to recover part of the arrears and give the defendant a chance to turn over.
In this way, the young man has a stable source of income, and the plaintiff company can also deduct 5,756 yuan from the young man's monthly salary to repay the debt. This "work-for-work" method not only alleviates the contradictions between the two sides, but also provides a chance for the guy to start over.
Netizens praised this, saying that this is really a reasonable and reasonable solution. Some netizens ridiculed: "Well, the guy won't have to worry about finding a job in the next few years, and he can continue his entrepreneurial dream in his spare time." Some netizens also sighed: "This plaintiff company is also quite humane, knowing that the other party has no money, and it is not too pressing, and is willing to give the guy a chance to reform himself." ”
Although this case is not large, it has brought us profound enlightenment. In fact, a balance can be found between law and human feelings. Sometimes, being tough and punitive will not solve the problem, but may exacerbate the conflict. And a flexible approach like the one in this case is not only acceptable to both parties, but also a win-win situation.
Therefore, although this story of "flesh debt repayment" sounds a bit bizarre, the wisdom and humanity in it are worth pondering and learning. When dealing with contradictions and disputes, we might as well be more understanding and tolerant, and less confrontational and conflicting, and perhaps we can find more new ways to solve problems.